May 23, 2007
[+/-] : [pets] smart and strong goldfish
Our fat goldfish "xiao bai" is sick.
She's been lying at the bottom of the tank for a long time, but getting serious these two days, she can barely move around. After spending some time on web, i think she got some disease called "swim bladder disorder."
I started with adding about 2 tablespoons sea salt in the tank (about 10 gallons), and she started moving a bit. Then I got her this hospital net hanging on the side of the tank she could stay in with less water pressure. I also add about 1/4 teaspoon of Epsom salt as advised.
Hopefully she'll get better tomorrow..
I know she's strong and smart, and will get through this...
...
Read more
May 19, 2007
[+/-] : [taiwan] 家庭美術館-美術家傳記叢書
20070712-書寄來了,我被媽咪一直狂念不已...不過她還是很喜歡啦...希望。
姐姐從朋友家借回了三本雄獅出版的家庭美術館-美術家傳記叢書,今晚一口氣把鄉園‧彩筆‧李澤藩讀完了。
早期的台灣美術家許多都出身自教師,尤其是台北師範後來是媽媽就讀的女師(現台北教育大學)培育出無數人材。(我最近也想勸說媽媽來寫故事^^)
50本的美術家傳記叢書由文建會策劃,由1993年-2005年,歷經12年完成,這50位前輩藝術家被喻為台灣美術中的五十座山岳。
台灣前輩美術家們對家鄉和生命的情感,所畫下的台灣史,才是真正精彩。
這是感動,不同於WEB 2.0給的是驚異。
全套書目如下
第一階段
《三峽.寫實.李梅樹》/湯皇珍著
《雲山.潑墨.張大千》/湯皇珍著
《閨秀.時代.陳進》/田麗卿著
《蘭嶼.裝飾.顏水龍》/涂瑛娥著
《陽光.印象.楊三郎》/湯皇珍著
《鄉園.彩筆.李澤藩》/陳惠玉著
《飛瀑.煙雲.黃君璧》/劉芳如著
《自然.寫生.林玉山》/陳瓊花著
《抒情.韻律.劉啟祥》/林育淳著
《野趣.摯情.沈耀初》/鄭水萍著
第二階段
《大地.牧歌.黃土水》/李欽賢著
《山水.獨行.席德進》/鄭惠美著
《王孫.逸士.溥心畬》/林銓居著
《色彩.和諧.廖繼春》/李欽賢著
《氣質.獨造.郭柏川》/李欽賢著
《高彩.智性.李石樵》/李欽賢著
《油彩.熱情.陳澄波》/林育淳著
《礦工.太陽.洪瑞麟》/江衍疇著
《隱士.才情.余承堯》/林銓居著
《草書.美髯.于右任》/林銓居著
第三階段
《雋永.自然.陳慧坤》/陳淑華著
《探險.巫師.劉其偉》/鄭惠美著
《影心.直情.張才》/蕭永盛著
《沉鬱.勁拔.臺靜農》/盧廷清著
《四季.彩妍.郭雪湖》/廖瑾瑗著
《完美.心象.陳夏雨》/廖雪芳著
《府城.彩繪.陳玉峰》/李奕興著
《鄉愁.記憶.鄧南光》/張照堂著
《文人.四絕.江兆申》/李蕭錕著
《書禪.厚實.曹秋圃》/李郁周著
第四階段
《百歲.師表.吳梅嶺》 /陳宏勉 著
《靈魅.狂想.洪通》/洪米貞 著
《礦城.麗島.倪蔣懷》/白雪蘭 著
《草書.狂雲.陳雲程》/陳宏勉 著
《古典.陶藝.林葆家》/廖雪芳 著
《膠彩.雅韻.林之助》/廖瑾瑗 著
《雲濤.雙絕.傅狷夫》/蔡文怡 著
《在野.雄獅.張萬傳》/廖瑾瑗 著
《畫意.集錦.郎靜山》/蕭永盛 著
《灣生.風土.立石鐵臣》/邱函妮 著
第五階段
《空間.造境.陳其寬》/鄭惠美 著
《綠野.樂章.廖德政》/李欽賢 著
《景觀.自在.楊英風》/蕭瓊瑞 著
《神遊.物外.陳庭詩》/鄭惠美 著
《浪人.秋歌.張義雄》/黃小燕 著
《彩墨.千山.馬白水》/席慕蓉 著
《木雕.暢意.李松林》/邱士華 著
《百年.孤寂.王攀元》/廖雪芳 著
《水彩.紫瀾.石川欽一郎》/顏娟英 著
《時光.點描.李鳴鵰》/蕭永盛 著
...
Read more
姐姐從朋友家借回了三本雄獅出版的家庭美術館-美術家傳記叢書,今晚一口氣把鄉園‧彩筆‧李澤藩讀完了。
早期的台灣美術家許多都出身自教師,尤其是台北師範後來是媽媽就讀的女師(現台北教育大學)培育出無數人材。(我最近也想勸說媽媽來寫故事^^)
50本的美術家傳記叢書由文建會策劃,由1993年-2005年,歷經12年完成,這50位前輩藝術家被喻為台灣美術中的五十座山岳。
台灣前輩美術家們對家鄉和生命的情感,所畫下的台灣史,才是真正精彩。
這是感動,不同於WEB 2.0給的是驚異。
全套書目如下
第一階段
《三峽.寫實.李梅樹》/湯皇珍著
《雲山.潑墨.張大千》/湯皇珍著
《閨秀.時代.陳進》/田麗卿著
《蘭嶼.裝飾.顏水龍》/涂瑛娥著
《陽光.印象.楊三郎》/湯皇珍著
《鄉園.彩筆.李澤藩》/陳惠玉著
《飛瀑.煙雲.黃君璧》/劉芳如著
《自然.寫生.林玉山》/陳瓊花著
《抒情.韻律.劉啟祥》/林育淳著
《野趣.摯情.沈耀初》/鄭水萍著
第二階段
《大地.牧歌.黃土水》/李欽賢著
《山水.獨行.席德進》/鄭惠美著
《王孫.逸士.溥心畬》/林銓居著
《色彩.和諧.廖繼春》/李欽賢著
《氣質.獨造.郭柏川》/李欽賢著
《高彩.智性.李石樵》/李欽賢著
《油彩.熱情.陳澄波》/林育淳著
《礦工.太陽.洪瑞麟》/江衍疇著
《隱士.才情.余承堯》/林銓居著
《草書.美髯.于右任》/林銓居著
第三階段
《雋永.自然.陳慧坤》/陳淑華著
《探險.巫師.劉其偉》/鄭惠美著
《影心.直情.張才》/蕭永盛著
《沉鬱.勁拔.臺靜農》/盧廷清著
《四季.彩妍.郭雪湖》/廖瑾瑗著
《完美.心象.陳夏雨》/廖雪芳著
《府城.彩繪.陳玉峰》/李奕興著
《鄉愁.記憶.鄧南光》/張照堂著
《文人.四絕.江兆申》/李蕭錕著
《書禪.厚實.曹秋圃》/李郁周著
第四階段
《百歲.師表.吳梅嶺》 /陳宏勉 著
《靈魅.狂想.洪通》/洪米貞 著
《礦城.麗島.倪蔣懷》/白雪蘭 著
《草書.狂雲.陳雲程》/陳宏勉 著
《古典.陶藝.林葆家》/廖雪芳 著
《膠彩.雅韻.林之助》/廖瑾瑗 著
《雲濤.雙絕.傅狷夫》/蔡文怡 著
《在野.雄獅.張萬傳》/廖瑾瑗 著
《畫意.集錦.郎靜山》/蕭永盛 著
《灣生.風土.立石鐵臣》/邱函妮 著
第五階段
《空間.造境.陳其寬》/鄭惠美 著
《綠野.樂章.廖德政》/李欽賢 著
《景觀.自在.楊英風》/蕭瓊瑞 著
《神遊.物外.陳庭詩》/鄭惠美 著
《浪人.秋歌.張義雄》/黃小燕 著
《彩墨.千山.馬白水》/席慕蓉 著
《木雕.暢意.李松林》/邱士華 著
《百年.孤寂.王攀元》/廖雪芳 著
《水彩.紫瀾.石川欽一郎》/顏娟英 著
《時光.點描.李鳴鵰》/蕭永盛 著
...
Read more
May 8, 2007
[+/-] : [pets] 丸丸我該讓妳吃什麼?
這次的寵物食品污染事件,從遭到中國工廠污染的麥麩(ChemNutra Wheat Gluten),演變到寵物食品界的大垮台,但卻更突顯消費者處於完全無知弱勢的地位。
為什麼我會這樣說呢?被污染的食品廠商不是在第一時間就出面處理,並一直後續跟進了嗎?
因為這次的事件,我們才發現麥麩被大量使用在寵物食品,而這種東西吃了對狗狗貓貓是百害無一利的!更可怕的是,幾乎80%的大牌子,在超商或大型寵物連鎖店佔架率最高的,都是同一個廠商製造的,也就是說Menu做了我們曾經以為很天然的Nutro,也做了寵物醫院才賣的Medical/Royal Canin,也做了便宜的Ol'Roy(Walmart自有品牌),這次的事件,消費者包括人和寵物,簡直是無處可逃!
在寵物地位比人高的美國加拿大尚且發生這種事,真不敢想像其他地方...
真是不敢說,在台灣市佔率最高的寶路和西莎,因為是同一家公司,並擁有自己的工廠和原料供應商,所以他們表示在這次的事件中他們的產品是未受污染的。但是寶路和西莎同樣使用大量的麥麩,這是消費者應該要注意的部份。
我在另一篇文中有大概提到一些寵物食品的參考資料網站,但都是英文的,我想熟悉中文的人也懶得看,後續我會盡量把資料整理成中文。
因為狗狗是肉食動物,貓咪也是,他們需要的是高品質的蛋白質,而不是一大堆的穀類。
寵物食品的標籤上,成份是照比例排列的,如果第一項成份你看到的就是麥麩 Wheat Gluten,或是一大堆的穀類,那就不用多說了...
如果是真正食物的成份,大部份會是你看得懂的,看起來像是吃的東西,如果一整篇成份表密密麻麻都是看不懂的化學成份,那也不用多說了...(像這次出問題的Melamine三聚氫氨,好像在中國拿來製造寵物食品已經行之有年)
在台灣的某些網站上還看得到賣"天然五穀機能性狗食"...真的不是誰都可以吃素,也不是吃素就是天然,天然不一定是無毒,無毒也不一定是有機!
寵物食品排名表-可以查一下寶路(Pedigree)、西莎(Cesar)、希爾斯(Hills)排在哪,廣告小狗可愛是沒有用的!真正的好廠商把錢都投注在製造真正的食物(real meal),不會有那麼多錢來砸廣告還可以賣得很便宜!
看懂寵物食品的標籤-這個很重要,勉強也要看一下!
美國FDA網站受污染寵物食品的品牌查詢網站
對這件事情我真的很擔心也很難過,我一直很小心狗食,也都會買營養品給他們吃,現在發現過去我讓cassie和丸丸吃了那麼多我以為很好的食物,原來都是不好的,真的很難過!或許本來cassie可以活更久一點。
...
Read more
為什麼我會這樣說呢?被污染的食品廠商不是在第一時間就出面處理,並一直後續跟進了嗎?
因為這次的事件,我們才發現麥麩被大量使用在寵物食品,而這種東西吃了對狗狗貓貓是百害無一利的!更可怕的是,幾乎80%的大牌子,在超商或大型寵物連鎖店佔架率最高的,都是同一個廠商製造的,也就是說Menu做了我們曾經以為很天然的Nutro,也做了寵物醫院才賣的Medical/Royal Canin,也做了便宜的Ol'Roy(Walmart自有品牌),這次的事件,消費者包括人和寵物,簡直是無處可逃!
在寵物地位比人高的美國加拿大尚且發生這種事,真不敢想像其他地方...
真是不敢說,在台灣市佔率最高的寶路和西莎,因為是同一家公司,並擁有自己的工廠和原料供應商,所以他們表示在這次的事件中他們的產品是未受污染的。但是寶路和西莎同樣使用大量的麥麩,這是消費者應該要注意的部份。
我在另一篇文中有大概提到一些寵物食品的參考資料網站,但都是英文的,我想熟悉中文的人也懶得看,後續我會盡量把資料整理成中文。
因為狗狗是肉食動物,貓咪也是,他們需要的是高品質的蛋白質,而不是一大堆的穀類。
寵物食品的標籤上,成份是照比例排列的,如果第一項成份你看到的就是麥麩 Wheat Gluten,或是一大堆的穀類,那就不用多說了...
如果是真正食物的成份,大部份會是你看得懂的,看起來像是吃的東西,如果一整篇成份表密密麻麻都是看不懂的化學成份,那也不用多說了...(像這次出問題的Melamine三聚氫氨,好像在中國拿來製造寵物食品已經行之有年)
在台灣的某些網站上還看得到賣"天然五穀機能性狗食"...真的不是誰都可以吃素,也不是吃素就是天然,天然不一定是無毒,無毒也不一定是有機!
寵物食品排名表-可以查一下寶路(Pedigree)、西莎(Cesar)、希爾斯(Hills)排在哪,廣告小狗可愛是沒有用的!真正的好廠商把錢都投注在製造真正的食物(real meal),不會有那麼多錢來砸廣告還可以賣得很便宜!
看懂寵物食品的標籤-這個很重要,勉強也要看一下!
美國FDA網站受污染寵物食品的品牌查詢網站
對這件事情我真的很擔心也很難過,我一直很小心狗食,也都會買營養品給他們吃,現在發現過去我讓cassie和丸丸吃了那麼多我以為很好的食物,原來都是不好的,真的很難過!或許本來cassie可以活更久一點。
...
Read more
May 7, 2007
[+/-] : [pets] What should I give to my Oneone?
The recent dog food recall is getting serious and spreading to vet recommended foods, Medical/Royal Canin.
About 2 weeks ago, oneone was having some difficulty with her stomach after eating Dentabone from Pedigree we used to give her as treats to help clean her teeth; but I found they've changed the ingredients, and I can see some uncooked rice pieces in oneone's stool. The vet suggested to use Medical Gastro to ease her stomach, and promised it to be a great food for her. I didn't spend much time on researching and got a few cans for her. As she always had dry food only, this can food is really exciting for little oneone.
Until yesterday, I was thinking I should better update the latest news about dog food recall. I went on Medical/Royal Canin website and found that some of their products are on the new released recall list because Menu also makes their products. Although Gastro is not on the recall list, how could I know if it is made by Menu or not? I still concern to give it to oneone, and I should return them to the vet.
I look up some reviews on forums, and found that this might not be the good food for my dog.
Then why the vets recommend the brand, and this brand is only sold in the vets! The's another brand we usually see in the vets, "Hills", also on the recall list. On www.dogfoodanalysis.com, I found some rating and reviews for almost all pet food brands. They rate the pet foods from 1 to 6 stars, Royal Canin, Hills and many other big brands we find in supermarkets or Petcetra have their food rated as only 1 star.
Here's how the review says about Royal Canin Energy (4800):
The first ingredient in the food is a named meat product, in meal form. This is the sole meat product in the food.
It is a concern to see fat as the second ingredient. Research at Purdue University has identified fat in the top four ingredients of a dry dog food as a factor increasing the risk of bloat in large breed dogs. Smaller breeds are untested.
The next two ingredients are both forms of corn. It is likely that if these ingredients were not split (see explanation of splitting on main page) the combined corn ingredients would in fact outweigh the chicken meal as the primary ingredient in the food. Corn is a problematic grain that is difficult for dogs to digest and thought to be the cause of a great many allergy and yeast infection problems. We prefer not to see this used in dog food. In it's gluten form, it is also a waste product for which the AAFCO definition is "the dried residue from corn after the removal of the larger part of the starch and germ, and the separation of the bran by the process employed in the wet milling manufacture of corn starch or syrup, or by enzymatic treatment of the endosperm".
Barley is a decent quality grain, but beet pulp is filler and a controversial ingredient – it is a by-product, being dried residue from sugar beets which has been cleaned and extracted in the process of manufacturing sugar. It is a controversial ingredient in dog food, claimed by some manufacturers to be a good source of fibre, and derided by others as an ingredient added to slow down the transition of rancid animal fats and causing stress to kidney and liver in the process. We note that beet pulp is an ingredient that commonly causes problems for dogs, including allergies and ear infections, and prefer not to see it used in dog food. There are less controversial products around if additional fibre is required.
After did some reading, I came to understand that contaminated wheat gluten is only a starting point, the real thing is we know too little about what these people put in our beloved ones food. Wheat gluten itself is not a good ingredient for pets, and grains are definitely no-no. Dogs are meat eaters, they need high quality, meat-based protein as their primary nutrient, not grains.
So I look up the ingredients on the Pedigree Dentabone which made oneone's stomach upset. The ingredients on the package are rice, sodium caseinate, rice flour, vegetable oil, tapioca starch, natural poultry flavour, propylene glycol, wheat barn, calcium, carbonate, dicalcium phosphate, potassium, chloride, sodium tripolyphosphate, microcrystalline cellulose, iodised salt, potassium sorbate (a preservative), choline, chloride, BHA/BHT (a preservative), eucalyptus flavour, zinc oxide, oxide, vitamin A, D3 And E supplements, zinc sulphate, iron sulphate, magnesium oxide, d-calcium pantothenate, niacin, copper sulphate, ribofavin, pyridoxine, hydrochloride (vitamin b6), thiamin mononitrate (vitamin b1), folic acid, vitamin b12 supplement.
There are 2 kinds of preservative! Wheat barn! Tapioca starch! And so many other thing I can't even prounce! If you look up the link on Pedigree website, you can find the ingredients are different to what I listed, the first 2 ingredients are WHEAT GLUTEN, HEAT TREATED WHEAT FLOUR, more wheats!!
I try to understand the labels on packages according to the dog food project
. This is a great site to get more knowledge on pet foods.
So, what should I give to my oneone?
Today I went to buy can food from Nature's Logic and Evanger's. Oneone has been taken dry food from Nature's Logic for about 2 month, and during these 2 weeks I gave her some can food mixed with dry food, she seemed to love it, so I think I'll keep this mix for her.
Next I'm going to learn how to make some homemade food for her.
The labels on pets foods packages are also important, although we usually
...
Read more
About 2 weeks ago, oneone was having some difficulty with her stomach after eating Dentabone from Pedigree we used to give her as treats to help clean her teeth; but I found they've changed the ingredients, and I can see some uncooked rice pieces in oneone's stool. The vet suggested to use Medical Gastro to ease her stomach, and promised it to be a great food for her. I didn't spend much time on researching and got a few cans for her. As she always had dry food only, this can food is really exciting for little oneone.
Until yesterday, I was thinking I should better update the latest news about dog food recall. I went on Medical/Royal Canin website and found that some of their products are on the new released recall list because Menu also makes their products. Although Gastro is not on the recall list, how could I know if it is made by Menu or not? I still concern to give it to oneone, and I should return them to the vet.
I look up some reviews on forums, and found that this might not be the good food for my dog.
Then why the vets recommend the brand, and this brand is only sold in the vets! The's another brand we usually see in the vets, "Hills", also on the recall list. On www.dogfoodanalysis.com, I found some rating and reviews for almost all pet food brands. They rate the pet foods from 1 to 6 stars, Royal Canin, Hills and many other big brands we find in supermarkets or Petcetra have their food rated as only 1 star.
Here's how the review says about Royal Canin Energy (4800):
The first ingredient in the food is a named meat product, in meal form. This is the sole meat product in the food.
It is a concern to see fat as the second ingredient. Research at Purdue University has identified fat in the top four ingredients of a dry dog food as a factor increasing the risk of bloat in large breed dogs. Smaller breeds are untested.
The next two ingredients are both forms of corn. It is likely that if these ingredients were not split (see explanation of splitting on main page) the combined corn ingredients would in fact outweigh the chicken meal as the primary ingredient in the food. Corn is a problematic grain that is difficult for dogs to digest and thought to be the cause of a great many allergy and yeast infection problems. We prefer not to see this used in dog food. In it's gluten form, it is also a waste product for which the AAFCO definition is "the dried residue from corn after the removal of the larger part of the starch and germ, and the separation of the bran by the process employed in the wet milling manufacture of corn starch or syrup, or by enzymatic treatment of the endosperm".
Barley is a decent quality grain, but beet pulp is filler and a controversial ingredient – it is a by-product, being dried residue from sugar beets which has been cleaned and extracted in the process of manufacturing sugar. It is a controversial ingredient in dog food, claimed by some manufacturers to be a good source of fibre, and derided by others as an ingredient added to slow down the transition of rancid animal fats and causing stress to kidney and liver in the process. We note that beet pulp is an ingredient that commonly causes problems for dogs, including allergies and ear infections, and prefer not to see it used in dog food. There are less controversial products around if additional fibre is required.
After did some reading, I came to understand that contaminated wheat gluten is only a starting point, the real thing is we know too little about what these people put in our beloved ones food. Wheat gluten itself is not a good ingredient for pets, and grains are definitely no-no. Dogs are meat eaters, they need high quality, meat-based protein as their primary nutrient, not grains.
So I look up the ingredients on the Pedigree Dentabone which made oneone's stomach upset. The ingredients on the package are rice, sodium caseinate, rice flour, vegetable oil, tapioca starch, natural poultry flavour, propylene glycol, wheat barn, calcium, carbonate, dicalcium phosphate, potassium, chloride, sodium tripolyphosphate, microcrystalline cellulose, iodised salt, potassium sorbate (a preservative), choline, chloride, BHA/BHT (a preservative), eucalyptus flavour, zinc oxide, oxide, vitamin A, D3 And E supplements, zinc sulphate, iron sulphate, magnesium oxide, d-calcium pantothenate, niacin, copper sulphate, ribofavin, pyridoxine, hydrochloride (vitamin b6), thiamin mononitrate (vitamin b1), folic acid, vitamin b12 supplement.
There are 2 kinds of preservative! Wheat barn! Tapioca starch! And so many other thing I can't even prounce! If you look up the link on Pedigree website, you can find the ingredients are different to what I listed, the first 2 ingredients are WHEAT GLUTEN, HEAT TREATED WHEAT FLOUR, more wheats!!
I try to understand the labels on packages according to the dog food project
. This is a great site to get more knowledge on pet foods.
So, what should I give to my oneone?
Today I went to buy can food from Nature's Logic and Evanger's. Oneone has been taken dry food from Nature's Logic for about 2 month, and during these 2 weeks I gave her some can food mixed with dry food, she seemed to love it, so I think I'll keep this mix for her.
Next I'm going to learn how to make some homemade food for her.
The labels on pets foods packages are also important, although we usually
...
Read more
May 4, 2007
[+/-] : [book] 好看的湖濱散記
回加拿大之後,似乎多了些時間(應該是很多時間),我刻意不讀這幾年慣讀的工具書,而找些老故事來看。
是因為讀慣了工具書,還是因為在學校讀的文學未入心?考試急著找譯本,老師發的文學作品影本通常只截錄部份,為了在短短幾個月間教給學生大量的流派和時代,在字裡行間尋找聲韻形式,卻失了”體會”的精神。
收拾行李時偶然看到一份當時教授影印給我們的文章,是一位台大外文系的外籍教授寫的”Naïve Reading”,提到台灣的學生太過著重在形式,卻完全忘了要以最單純的心態來閱讀。十年後再看這篇文章,原來說得如此精闢!當時在學校裡讀,恐怕也是為了分析所謂”英文教育之流變”或”現代文學教育之迷思”等等看不懂想不透的題目。
忽然想起這些事,因為今晚重讀了梭羅(Henry David Thoreau)的湖濱散記(Walden),志文出版,孔繁雲先生翻譯。這是所有念外文系必讀的小說,可能很多人只讀了教授逼迫的一小段本文,一大段思想分析。今晚著實的讀了幾段,發現它其實和工具書一樣有趣,而且孔先生花了兩年的翻譯真是漂亮。這是梭羅的生活詳記,從蓋房子到記帳,到田野小動物的素描,簡直可以說是部落格的始祖!150年後讀起來,可一點也不老氣呢!
截一段梭羅描寫他去偷松鼠的栗子,好可愛
“當栗子成熟時,我也貯存半蒲耳以防冬天。在那個季節裡,肩上背著袋子,手裡拿著棍子,漫遊在林肯鎮的、當時仍為一片無邊無際的栗樹林中,看到的是蕭蕭而下的無邊落木,聽到的是紅色松鼠和鰹鳥不停的尖叫,此情此景,真是令人難忘;如今這栗樹林已如枕木一樣,長眠在鐵軌之下了;松鼠和鰹鳥之所以尖叫,是因為我有時偷取了牠們的部份帶著外殼的栗果;我所以要偷,是因為牠們所挑選的帶著外殼的栗果,裡面一定包含著上好的栗子…”
連中譯本都這麼好看的書,建議可以看完整個故事再回頭看序言和思想。
在Gutenberg上有免費的英文版可以下載~
...
Read more
是因為讀慣了工具書,還是因為在學校讀的文學未入心?考試急著找譯本,老師發的文學作品影本通常只截錄部份,為了在短短幾個月間教給學生大量的流派和時代,在字裡行間尋找聲韻形式,卻失了”體會”的精神。
收拾行李時偶然看到一份當時教授影印給我們的文章,是一位台大外文系的外籍教授寫的”Naïve Reading”,提到台灣的學生太過著重在形式,卻完全忘了要以最單純的心態來閱讀。十年後再看這篇文章,原來說得如此精闢!當時在學校裡讀,恐怕也是為了分析所謂”英文教育之流變”或”現代文學教育之迷思”等等看不懂想不透的題目。
忽然想起這些事,因為今晚重讀了梭羅(Henry David Thoreau)的湖濱散記(Walden),志文出版,孔繁雲先生翻譯。這是所有念外文系必讀的小說,可能很多人只讀了教授逼迫的一小段本文,一大段思想分析。今晚著實的讀了幾段,發現它其實和工具書一樣有趣,而且孔先生花了兩年的翻譯真是漂亮。這是梭羅的生活詳記,從蓋房子到記帳,到田野小動物的素描,簡直可以說是部落格的始祖!150年後讀起來,可一點也不老氣呢!
截一段梭羅描寫他去偷松鼠的栗子,好可愛
“當栗子成熟時,我也貯存半蒲耳以防冬天。在那個季節裡,肩上背著袋子,手裡拿著棍子,漫遊在林肯鎮的、當時仍為一片無邊無際的栗樹林中,看到的是蕭蕭而下的無邊落木,聽到的是紅色松鼠和鰹鳥不停的尖叫,此情此景,真是令人難忘;如今這栗樹林已如枕木一樣,長眠在鐵軌之下了;松鼠和鰹鳥之所以尖叫,是因為我有時偷取了牠們的部份帶著外殼的栗果;我所以要偷,是因為牠們所挑選的帶著外殼的栗果,裡面一定包含著上好的栗子…”
連中譯本都這麼好看的書,建議可以看完整個故事再回頭看序言和思想。
在Gutenberg上有免費的英文版可以下載~
...
Read more
May 3, 2007
[+/-] : [taiwan] Let Taiwan Be Taiwan - English Version
original blog I found this clip
I'm from Taiwan, and I do business with Chinese as well.
What I believe is both countries will be better places to live if all the political stereo types are eliminated....
Read more
May 2, 2007
[+/-] : [fair trade] if you love coffee, make it fair trade!
For a 3 dollar cup of coffee, the farmer earns 3 cents.
This is the first title shown on "Black Gold" film trailer. But I believe the situation is worse than the words.I love coffee, and I just can't sit and watch the coffee kids dying of hunger, not mention they don't even have schooling.
I've put 3 episodes from "Black Gold" movie on my Picasa. Please click on the links bellow to see the episodes.
Coffee Kids
Sidama, the coffee region grows starbucks' coffee. In 2006, kids here were hit by serious famine.
Starbucks claimed their cost of coffee bean has increased from $1.28/pl to $1.42/pl since 2005. If you use 7g of coffee beans for a cup of espresso, and you can make up to 80 cups of espresso with 1 pound coffee beans which cost only $1.42 per pound. The math is very easy here.
Coffee Mothers
We all know that best espresso beans are roasted by Italian.. but we may not know that best coffee beans are hand picked by these African women, and they are earning less than $0.5 per day.
Coffee Fathers
These coffee farmers were gathering to discuss how to use the profit they gain from fair trading. They decided to build a school, even the earning is not enough to build one.
If you believe in coffee, and believe in a fair world, please log on to the official website of the movie "Black Gold" and pledge to see "Black Gold" movie in your city.
www.blackgoldmovie.com
More video clips about fair trade
Black Gold film clips
Black Gold DVD is now available on California Newsreel
You can also read my other article in Chinese here.
...
Read more
May 1, 2007
[+/-] : [fair trade] Black Gold 黑金-貧窮-我的羞愧
決定做茶之後,在找supplier時,我知道自己要找的是fair trade supplier,但台灣沒有fair trade,所以台灣的supplier我直接找茶農。這原本是一個既定計劃,也如期找到了supplier,我一直認為fair trade是一個公平交易方式,一個早就該被遵循卻為利益所掩蓋的模式,我無情地認為這是應該還給農民的公道,直到昨晚看了Black Gold。
我被貧窮震攝。
我們的罪惡不是fair trade可以彌補,貧窮不是fair trade可以消弭。
我為自己不得已時仍和朋友約在Starbucks深深感到罪惡,我為自己省幾個錢而購買Costco的大量咖啡豆而感到羞恥。(Costco 和 Save on Foods 都有售ethical or fair trade coffee)
我嗜咖啡如命,卻不懂得從生豆中挑選出壞豆子,也不懂得種咖啡樹。
挑選生豆的婦人們一天賺不到0.5美元,而我們以為一磅台幣800元的espresso豆是多麼上等,咖啡烘焙師和聞香師是多麼迷人而高尚。
我搜羅咖啡知識,花幾百塊買咖啡書,卻未曾為咖啡農的孩子買一本書。
書上有美麗的咖啡山林,豔紅的咖啡果實,卻從未提及咖啡的孩子沒學校念。
我覺得Starbucks的咖啡口感不如香氣,我認為它壟斷咖啡市場,但我沒想過為Starbucks生產咖啡的地區正在鬧饑荒,孩子們的生命隨咖啡價格一點一滴逝去。
我計算每一公克咖啡的成本效益,就像咖啡豆只是烘焙後迷人的商品,卻從不知道咖啡的孩子多麼貧窮。令他們窮苦的咖啡樹,在我的國家富裕了多少商家,甚至是1/4台灣人的夢想。
咖啡農得到Tedesse透過fair trade為他們帶來的報酬,他們決定要用這筆錢蓋一所學校,但是錢並不夠,於是有人提出應該等得到下一筆收入時再來蓋學校,這時一位父親說了:
"我們可以從我們的口袋裡拿出錢來,雖然我沒有半毛錢,但我可以賣掉我的衣服來捐錢,這樣我們的孩子可以學習,而我的國家可以成長。"
我另外也看了Starbucks的短片,他們表示目前每磅咖啡豆的成本是美金$1.42,較2005年的$1.28已提高許多。
試算以7克espresso豆泡一杯short的daily coffee,1磅咖啡豆可泡36杯,如以 USD$1.5 (很久沒喝,不知多少錢)計算則零售價約 USD$54。
別忘了,為了C.A.F.E.(Coffee and Farmer Equity)和Fair Trade,他們可是硬生生將成本從每磅 $1.28 提高到 $1.42,markup是38倍。
我的茶不會以Starbucks的成功經營模式為目標,我要讓喝的人放心,賣的人安心,種的人開心。
黑金-片段
挑選生豆的婦人
Starbucks 咖啡豆產區的孩子
伊索比亞咖啡農的會議
更多黑金片段
更多 fair trade 影片
...
Read more
我被貧窮震攝。
我們的罪惡不是fair trade可以彌補,貧窮不是fair trade可以消弭。
我為自己不得已時仍和朋友約在Starbucks深深感到罪惡,我為自己省幾個錢而購買Costco的大量咖啡豆而感到羞恥。(Costco 和 Save on Foods 都有售ethical or fair trade coffee)
我嗜咖啡如命,卻不懂得從生豆中挑選出壞豆子,也不懂得種咖啡樹。
挑選生豆的婦人們一天賺不到0.5美元,而我們以為一磅台幣800元的espresso豆是多麼上等,咖啡烘焙師和聞香師是多麼迷人而高尚。
我搜羅咖啡知識,花幾百塊買咖啡書,卻未曾為咖啡農的孩子買一本書。
書上有美麗的咖啡山林,豔紅的咖啡果實,卻從未提及咖啡的孩子沒學校念。
我覺得Starbucks的咖啡口感不如香氣,我認為它壟斷咖啡市場,但我沒想過為Starbucks生產咖啡的地區正在鬧饑荒,孩子們的生命隨咖啡價格一點一滴逝去。
我計算每一公克咖啡的成本效益,就像咖啡豆只是烘焙後迷人的商品,卻從不知道咖啡的孩子多麼貧窮。令他們窮苦的咖啡樹,在我的國家富裕了多少商家,甚至是1/4台灣人的夢想。
咖啡農得到Tedesse透過fair trade為他們帶來的報酬,他們決定要用這筆錢蓋一所學校,但是錢並不夠,於是有人提出應該等得到下一筆收入時再來蓋學校,這時一位父親說了:
"我們可以從我們的口袋裡拿出錢來,雖然我沒有半毛錢,但我可以賣掉我的衣服來捐錢,這樣我們的孩子可以學習,而我的國家可以成長。"
我另外也看了Starbucks的短片,他們表示目前每磅咖啡豆的成本是美金$1.42,較2005年的$1.28已提高許多。
試算以7克espresso豆泡一杯short的daily coffee,1磅咖啡豆可泡36杯,如以 USD$1.5 (很久沒喝,不知多少錢)計算則零售價約 USD$54。
別忘了,為了C.A.F.E.(Coffee and Farmer Equity)和Fair Trade,他們可是硬生生將成本從每磅 $1.28 提高到 $1.42,markup是38倍。
我的茶不會以Starbucks的成功經營模式為目標,我要讓喝的人放心,賣的人安心,種的人開心。
黑金-片段
挑選生豆的婦人
Starbucks 咖啡豆產區的孩子
伊索比亞咖啡農的會議
更多黑金片段
更多 fair trade 影片
...
Read more
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)